Why Excess Benefit Transactions Are Out-of-Bounds
December 9, 2021

Emily was a dedicated board member of her community’s most prominent social-services charity. But her commitment to the cause and the nonprofit’s programs didn’t prevent her from inadvertently violating the rule against excess benefit transactions. This happened when the organization wanted to build a new facility and bought land from her even though similar, and potentially cheaper, property was available from nonaffiliated sellers. Emily made only a minimal profit, but the IRS took notice and began investigating the deal.

You may know that your nonprofit needs to avoid excess benefit transactions, but are you sure you know what they are? A full understanding can help your nonprofit avoid Emily’s and her charity’s mistake.

Don’t Let Insiders Profit

First, it’s important to understand the concept of private inurement. A private benefit is any payment or transfer of assets made, directly or indirectly, by your nonprofit that’s 1) beyond reasonable compensation for the services provided or the goods sold to your organization, or 2) for services or products that don’t further your tax-exempt purpose. If any of your net earnings inure to the benefit of an individual, the IRS won’t view your nonprofit as operating primarily to further its tax-exempt purpose.

The private inurement rules extend the private benefit prohibition to “insiders” or “disqualified persons” — generally any officer, director, individual or organization who is in a position to exert significant influence over your nonprofit’s activities and finances. The rule also covers their family members and organizations they control. A violation occurs when a transaction that ultimately benefits the insider is approved.

Remember Your “Purpose”

Of course, the rules don’t prohibit all payments, such as salaries and wages, to an insider. You simply need to make sure that any payment is reasonable relative to the services or goods provided. In other words, the payment must be made with your nonprofit’s tax-exempt purpose in mind.

To ensure you can later prove that any transaction was reasonable and made for a valid exempt purpose, formally document all payments made to insiders. Also ensure that board members understand their duty of care. This refers to a board member’s responsibility to act in good faith, in your organization’s best interest, and with such care that proper inquiry, skill and diligence has been exercised in the performance of duties.

Possible Repercussions

Violators of the rule face excise taxes and the loss of exempt status — although the latter is rare. Bad PR and loss of community support are also major risks. Contact us if you’re unsure about a pending transaction or want us to help educate your stakeholders.

© 2021

You might also like

Putting Accountability into Practice

Putting Accountability into Practice

At its base, “accountability” means taking responsibility for outcomes — both good and bad. But one common byproduct of accountability is that results are actually more likely to be positive than negative. That’s because accountable managers work proactively, seeking...

read more
The Audit Is Over. Now What?

The Audit Is Over. Now What?

Whew! That’s probably your reaction when outside experts announce that their audit of your nonprofit is complete. But even if auditors have left your premises and returned the documents they’ve reviewed, the work isn’t really over. Not only do your executive director...

read more
The FLSA Asks Your Nonprofit to Accurately Classify Staffers

The FLSA Asks Your Nonprofit to Accurately Classify Staffers

Are your nonprofit’s staffers employees or independent contractors? It’s an important question because under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), misclassifying workers can lead to penalties and other costs. If you haven’t reviewed your staffers’ status since the...

read more